Outchurched

CNNN has a quick chat with Archbishop Jensen, and learns that Archbishop Jensen likes attractive guys with clean teeth… although Leviticus seems to say “no” to the Arbishop’s homoerotic desires.

The description on the YouTube video:

The Anglican Archbishop of Sydney Peter Jensen is asked which parts of the Bible are still relevant, after he used the Bible against gays.

CNNN: Hello Dr. Jensen!

Jensen: How nice to see you!

CNNN: Just want to congratulate you on returning the church to the Bible… the text of the Bible

Jensen: Thank you, very kind of you.

CNNN: I was wondering, Dr. Jensen, do you agree with Exodus 35 that we should put to death those that work on the Sabbath?

Jensen: Thank you. I always believe that the Bible is the truth and the word of God.

CNNN: So we should put to death those that work on the Sabbath?

Jensen: Well, no, because you have to read the whole Bible. When you read the whole Bible you see that that’s not true.

CNNN: Where is the part in the Bible that says Exodus is not right?

Jensen: Can I say that you’ve obviously cleaned your teeth. You don’t have, y’know…

CNNN: You’re not ignoring the question here are you?

Jensen: You don’t have that sort of…

CNNN: Surely, putting people to death for working on the Sabbath, is there some, where in the Bible does it say…

Jensen: We don’t do that anymore.

CNNN: You’re wearing glasses, Dr. Jensen. Doesn’t it say in Leviticus 21, 20 that those who have defective sight cannot take the communion of God?

Jensen: No, well, no.

CNNN: Nor dwarfs, nor hunchbacks, I think.

Jensen: You’ve got the advantage of me… should we look it up?

CNNN: Sure. Look it up? More than welcome to look it up… yes. Here it is… Leviticus

Jensen: You’re so good looking…

CNNN: You don’t want to say that because a man shouldn’t lie with a man like he would with a woman otherwise he’s an abomination. That’s Leviticus 18, isn’t it?

Jensen: I don’t know. You are obviously well educated.

CNNN: I’m seeking more education, Dr. Jensen, as to why is it that Leviticus 18 is still relevant whereas Leviticus 21, 22 and all these others aren’t relevant. Can you put out a new Bible with the true bits highlighted?

(h/t: Dwindling in Unbelief)

This entry was posted by Rev. Dan on Monday, March 24th, 2008 at 2:52 pm and is filed under Politics, Media, Christlikeness?. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.